This set of exemplars illustrates the use of the e-asTTle marking rubric to score writing across the writing prompts. The exemplars cover the full scoring range. asTTle Writing Rubric in Student Speak. Created by Clevedon School from asTTle Writing Rubrics. Last updated: Ideas. Learning Intention. The e asTTle framework for assessing writing. Developing the prompts, marking rubric, and annotated exemplars. Extending the usefulness.

Author: JoJogrel Voodooramar
Country: Niger
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 7 January 2006
Pages: 473
PDF File Size: 7.79 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.27 Mb
ISBN: 955-2-39739-936-8
Downloads: 22598
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kitaur

Generic exemplars are referenced in the marking rubric, with two exemplars linked to mtrix scoring category within each element. You will find these inside the scoring rubric. There is a need to emphasise the scale score and the margin of error as the e-asTTle measure. Anna Sullivan Chief Executive.

Marking resources for e-asTTle writing (revised)

The Ministry will provide information to assist in score comparisons. The annotated exemplars are samples of qsttle writing produced in response to each e-asTTle writing prompt. It is best for teachers to point to the rubric scores given for each element when discussing a report with students. Moderation and things to consider. What features of writing do you notice?

If you have a question you would like added, please email us here. Imprecision also needs to be taken into account when considering the curriculum level descriptor. Home Teacher resources Marking resources for e-asTTle writing.

The matrix focuses on how learners within each broad stage typically write. This page will be updated regularly as new questions arise. At the same time, it is important to develop writing skills in curriculum-related contexts e.


This is the most current and correct version of zsttle conversion table and replaces an incorrect version dated “November 14”. For example, when scoring the vocabulary element, the wriitng is on the range, precision and effectiveness of words, rather than on the accuracy of spelling. Students who score in the lowest category for every element assessed by e-asTTle writing all R1s are not well targeted by the assessment.

Responsive Theme powered by WordPress. A student who scores 4A is probably somewhere in the range 4P to 5B. When you have this information about your own learners, you will be ready to start the next section – Making a ‘best-fit’.

You can check that you have the correct version by ensuring that it is called Conversion table April — rubric scores to scale scoresor that writinng score of 26 on the table converts to curriculum level 3B not 3A. Others will be better suited to younger xsttle. Te Kete Ipurangi Navigation: They are representative examples of writing for each prompt.

It is important that teachers read and follow the administration guidelines carefully. The curriculum scores are a reference point, which link the test performance with the performance level that might writin be expected from someone working at that level. Michael Absolum Company Director. When you have confidently completed this section you are ready to consider how this information helps you, and what you should do next to help your learners.

For example, if the specified purpose is to describe and the student also explains, only the descriptive features are scored within the structure and language element.

e-asTTle writing tool (revised)

To assign a category score of R4 in a particular element, the conditions for a score of R3 in that element must also have been met. Part B contains in-depth technical information on how the tool was constructed.


The conversion table should be used only when a non-standardised form of writing assessment is undertaken. Writing samples from your students from a range of curriculum contexts.

Writing: Moderation and things to consider | e-asTTle Help

A curriculum level of 4A for example means that given 40 minutes to write to a particular prompt under test conditions the student has been able to produce a text of sufficient quality to indicate they have the writing skills and competencies described as appropriate for students working at an advanced stage for Level 4 of the curriculum.

They provide very specific instructions on what to do and what to say to students. The revised writing tool assesses writing across five purposes. Mary Chamberlain Company Director. Instead, you will have to select a rubric score ranging fromor sometimes The descriptors within each category score are hierarchical and cumulative. More Current and recent projects Evaluation Associates matgix on a wide range of projects in collaboration with clients and partners.

Teachers can use the table to convert an e-asTTle rubric score to an e-asTTle writing scale score an aWs score and curriculum level descriptor. The matris of the prompt you made up will not be known, and you will not get accurate curriculum level information.